Outrcry as Petitioners Protest Delayed Justice in Ugandan Minorities Case

By Melanie Nathan, July 25, 2013.

Jjuuko Adrian , Uganda
Jjuuko Adrian , Uganda

This week Ugandan Constitutional Court saw protests when, according to the Daily Monitor,  “minority groups stormed the Constitutional Court in Kampala on Tuesday, protesting what they called ‘delayed justice’.

The potential landmark case of Jjuuko Adrian v. Attorney General Constitutional Petition No.1 of 2009,  has yet to receive a ruling, which could have been handed down as early September last year. Advocates had heard back from the registrar earlier this year apologizing for delays and promising a resolution in this case that has been lingering since 2009. But there has been none and the delay is causing consternation.

Jjuuko, a Ugandan human rights lawyer and activist, who believes in equality for all, works with Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF) on behalf of other minority groups, was seeking court orders to quash Section 15 (6) (d) of the Equal Opportunities Commission Act that he says infringes on their rights from not getting redress from the Commission.  If the case receives a positive ruling,  the rights of marginalized groups in Uganda would be hugely impacted.

The Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF) and its executive director, Adrian Jjuuko, are trying to overturn this section because it prevents Uganda’s Equal Opportunities Commission from investigating discrimination against people whom cultural majorities in Uganda consider “immoral or socially unacceptable.”

As the HRAPF states:

“This simply defeats the whole purpose of the commission, which is to eliminate discrimination and inequalities against any individual … and take affirmative action in favour of groups marginalised on the basis of sex, gender, age, disability or any other reason created by history, tradition or custom for the purpose of redressing imbalances which exist against them.’ “

Pepe Julian Onziema, an advocate for Sexual Minorities in Uganda, (SMUG) was among the petitioners who tried to deliver statements petitioning for a judgment. However the court registrar,  John Ochepa Arutu, declined to receive the petitioners’ statement.

“According to Mr Edward Mwebaza, an advocacy officer with Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum, said the statement was declined because “it would set a bad precedent for other pending cases”.  Mwebaza, apparently, left the statement with the secretary.”

The aggrieved groups today included LGBTI groups, people living with HIV/Aids, sex workers, among others.

 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.