Judge Kennard’s argument is killing me. She says that the people have the right to change the constitution is in itself an inalienable right. So in waying up the inalianble right of the minority vs. that of the people , seems to her that the minority takes second place which in effect means that minorities do not have the protection of the constitution i see this as a flawed argument on the part of the Judge. Thanks KRON 4 for live Broadcasts. Jerry Brown – you need to be the one delivering this argument.
I quote my friend Cathy Ross Perry:-
“It seemed that she was saying that she’d based her prior decision (supporting gay marriage) on the CA Constitution, and that now that the CA Constitution has been amended to define marriage as a man/woman union, she would vote differently. Which seems to me to beg the question about whether the constitution was changed in a legal fashion.”
Catherine Ross-Perry
Staff Attorney
Fair Housing of Marin
O-blog-dee-o-blog-da 